- Status of ToR (accepted)
	* We will report to NMEG, not NIT, otherwise no substantial changes. Kristian made a new picture of the cooperation between various bodies.
- Status TSOs
	* SVK      : Still working on setting up production ECP. There was a discussion on whether they should install 4.6.1 or 4.7.x - advise from NEX is 4.6.1, the risk of going directly to 4.7.x will be entirely on SvK
	* Fingrid  : Have not upgraded to 4.6.1 in production, but plan to do so   
	* Energinet: Fatal ERROR when ECP-process was stopped during database-boot (in liquibase-process). Unicorn points to Liquibase to come up with a solution. AP1 Kristian Skov: NEX should receive a clear, written explanation of the issue in order to make decision on further actions.
	* SN       : Testing 4.7.0, running 4.6.1 in production. 
- Status NRSC
	* Setting up DNS-forwarding in all TSOs, preparing for test of new Azure-On-Premise-setup of ECP-network. SN will be the first to test.
- Status eSett
	* Lot of discussion about MessageTypes as well as Services. AP2 Mika Niemi: Divide all messages into groups (=Services). Assess if short MessageTypes are doable (better readability in ECP/EDX-GUI). Currently testing with Energinet.
- Status NBM/ACE-OL (MT: NBM-Z35 SERVICE: NBM-COMMONDATA)
	* Energinet/Fingrid has been in touch with SN in order to send ACE-OL. SN has prepared setup on ECP/EDX to allow for this.
	* The number of messages will be high, and might be a short-term (1 yr?) problem. 
	* Decision: Start testing with a high number of messages and evaluate the best way to fix it (there are some options). NBM must be prepared to severly slash the number of messages in test if it causes too much trouble for the ECP-platform.
- Status from CSSg/ENTSO-e
	- 4.7.1/1.8.1
- MessageType - should we specify both a "unique prefix" AND "document-specific postfix" - it might not be clear to everyone
	* No decision, but we're close to a consensus
- MesageType - Should we require MT to be specified in ALL situations, also for intra-national traffic?
	* Not discussed
- Common plan for upgrade of EDX/ECP in NEM (how often? How much can the version differ? Should we specify, or leave it to be dealt with case-by-case?)
	* Discussion to be continued